Fragment Sixteen - The Book of Briars

The Reading Room The Monarch Papers Archive Fragment Sixteen
174

I do.

7/26, 2016 Guide launched
8/10, 2016 Fragment 1 roman numerals decoded 5.18.24.27.44.52.59.88.104.108
10/30, 2016 Key 1 roman numerals decoded 182, 192, 221, 267, 299, 314
11/18, 2016 Fragment 5, letter found by DG : 323, 326, 385, 394, 395, 410, 435
2/19, 2017 Key 2, roman numerals: 451, 464, 537, 554, 671, 919, 953
3/8, 2017 Fragment 9 Thank you @Gryphonic!
First page - 955.981.993.1007.1011
Second page - 1089.1128.1132.1139
Third assessment - 1324, 1376, 1409, 1413, 1416, 1627, 1647, 1654
Fragment 13:
Then page - 1664, 1667, 1852, 1855
Now page - 1872, 1887, 1945, 1951
10/1/2017 - Last page - 1872, 1887, 1941, 1995, 2005, 2070, 2087, 2357, 2359, 2356

15 Likes
175

Do you reckon thats the Ascension is the picture?

6 Likes
176

MDCLXIV.MDCLXVILMDCCCLIL.MDCCCLXV

That’s the one from Fragment 13 “Then” Page.

10 Likes
177

Then page - 1664, 1667, 1852, 18515
Now page - 1872, 1887, 1945, 1951
Frag 4 - 1872, 1887, 1941, 1995, 2005, 2070, 2087, 2357, 2359, 2356

8 Likes
178

Should we split this off into a new thread?

3 Likes
179

There is a thread on the roman numerals actually. Roman Numerals a cipher? - #10 by Robert But I don’t think we need to worry about it too much. Let’s just collect them in one place and wait to see what Deeds says.

7 Likes
180

MDCCCLXXII.MDCCCI.XXXVII,MCMXLV.MCMLI.MCMXCV.MMVI.MMLXX.MMLXXXVII.MMCCCLVII.MMCCCLIX.MMCCCLXVI

current one. do with it what you will.

8 Likes
181

Nim has updated her post on Frag 13, @Robert.

8 Likes
182

Aye I’ve updated my post above.

10 Likes
183

OKay, that’s the last page done…

10 Likes
184

Added to the list. That’s weird. The numbers went down at one point.

11 Likes
185

Yeah, I saw the doubling too and went back to check… it’s very odd

8 Likes
186

Unless… and I don’t want to really contemplate this too much… but if those are a record of our numbers. Those could have been the ones we lost to the Storm.

10 Likes
187

It almost looks like years to me, liek the year the book was sent to. But there now a couple that would be in the future…

9 Likes
188

It bothers me that the numbers went in sequence… until this last set.

8 Likes
189

But we did all those wierd time things this past little bit

8 Likes
190

Minor correction.

The recent image numbers are 1872, 1887, 1945 and 1951 then 2005, 2070, 2087, 2357, 2359, 2356

The numbers actually overlap between the now page and the latest image. So itdoesn’t go down, just some numbers are twice.

8 Likes
191

Because I can’t help but put on the old tinfoil one more time :tinfoilhat::

When I originally looked at the numbers you collated above I majorly tinfoiled that maybe we had actually affected the timeline and The Book was now merging or correcting the sequence to represent the changed timeline

But then I looked at the latest illustration again. Here are the numbers I have for the latest image…

1872 1887 1945 1951 1995 2006 2070 2087 2357 2359 2366

There’s still a bit of overlap but if you take another look, they’re actually all the same numbers, which leads me to less dramatically tinfoil that maybe the Book is overlapping because it was either “unconscious” or because it was pulled from another time?

I wanted to be sure that there weren’t different numbers, only overlapping numbers, so I went back through all the fragment with roman numerals, and eliminating the duplicate overlapping numbers I came up with this…

5 18 24 27 44 52 59 88 104 108 182 192 221 267 299 314 323 326 385 394 395 410 435 451 464 537 554 671 919 953 955 981 993 1007 1011 1089 1128 1132 1139 1324 1376 1409 1413 1416 1627 1647 1654 1664 1667 1852 1865 1872 1887 1945 1951 1995 2006 2070 2087 2357 2359 2366

Would someone mind checking my work?

14 Likes
192

This was supposed to be the end. I’ve had about seven endings in the past 12 months.

13 Likes
193

It looks right. These appear to be years, atleast that’s what I see. And it looks like, if they are supposed to be our Lodge was a fluke, not even supposed to have the BoB. That actually would make sense how we were able to open the it. A “glitch” or mistake, if you will, in the maqic. Maybe these were the set times the the BoB was supposed to appear. I don’t know, the tin foil hat doesn’t look good on me.

6 Likes