As with hackercat I spent entire too much time on this… 
@Viviane You get all the time donuts. They have sprinkles.~ 
24 Likes
ily, Rev. 
7 Likes
Absolutely glorious!!!
6 Likes
This needs to be made into a shirt 
8 Likes
My new wallpaper!!
6 Likes
I love it so much!!!
5 Likes
thank you! that makes some more sense i think.
not at all where i was going with it.
good thinking!
4 Likes
Oh, but isn’t this a wonderful surprise to wake up to. Thanks to everyone for your hard work (especially given that I, like Endri, suffer from a distinct lack of temporal papercraft skills), none of this would be possible without you 
Good work, @Viviane!
10 Likes
More numbers. Lovely.
5 Likes
It seems that the word “Book” is used to mean a heck of a lot more than bound paper in the realm of things Magiq.
The “Book” of Briars is a spell. Inlaudetus is an era in history called the “Book” of the Hidden.
To me at least, Augernon’s tone in this message is a healthy reminder that there is a hell of a lot more to all of this than solving the Fragments.
Thoth keep them, Ma’at guide them.
16 Likes
Those look kinda like coordinates.
7 Likes
Well, entered as coordinates, they are for some wilderness in Kyrgystan.
6 Likes
Are those clues for Fragment 14? What happened to the first fragment-per-key Roman numerals our “lodge” had been getting? We should ask Augie if they have been getting the same numeral sequence with Fragments 1-12 as we had, or could they have been getting coordinate values instead?
4 Likes
I think those may be the Roman numerals on the bottom of the pages we got from Augernon. Could be wrong, though. I think these are the next clues that will lead to Fragment 14.
Hopefully Augie gets an email from the Book, soon.
5 Likes
Do they fit with our sequence?
Edit:. Took me a minute to find the thread, but I don’t think they fit.
http://forum.ackerlygreen.com/t/roman-numerals-a-cipher/31/16?u=augustus_octavian
4 Likes
As far as I remember. I posted the pages to the Lore section.
3 Likes
The last ones @Robert posted we’re equivalent to “1647” and “1654” - I don’t think we’ve seen long decimals like these before.
3 Likes
I mean, I could be wrong. So don’t take my word for it. I’m very sure that plenty of our experiences have been very different from the 94’s.
4 Likes